guesswho

I just jumped on a Brute X from PSE. I shot it and the Bow Madness XS and went with the Brute x for money purposes.

I'm looking at the Extreme Archery Challenger sight for my new Brute X. I'm gonna have to deal with the El'Cheap-o sight for now though.

Does the Diamond and the Darton have a positive draw stop, or infinite?

I'd venture to say they had the limb bolts backed out too far, or something similar. I don't think it is the brands issue as much as who set it up.

My friend has one and it works fine too. However, I played with one with a few more features, and I think when I get me one, I'll get one with a few more features. I works fine, but for a little more money you can get a few more extras.

Muzzy 125 Gr. three blade for now.

Disregard question, already figured out the answer. For anyone else who may have the same question; It has to have a seperate module for each setting. The number holes I see is for the let off setting to be placed in the correct slot according to the Draw Length module it has installed.

I'm not gonna be makeing a shot much father than that anyway so you just reaffirmed my decision. If I live in the mountains or something where a longer up/down hill shot would be made I could see spending the extra for the option.

I have a typhoon by PSE with the centerfire cam on it (had it for a couple of years). It is a really nice bow for the price I gave for it. I'm thinking of changing the let off to 65% from 80% to get a few more feet per second out of it. I was looking at the cam module. All that is required to change the let off is an allen wrench and flipping it over. My question is this. The module for let off has numbered holes it goes in. It is currently in number 7 and it matches what is supposed to be the draw length from when I ordered it and what is on PSE's website. The owners manual said to change the module for different draw lengths. Is it changed by moving the same module or is there different modules that go into the different holes?

Thanks Buckie.

Thanks for the suggestions. I've ruled that I'm not going to need the Angle compensation units. Now only to select which one I want to buy.

Hey Johnf do you find the scan and rain mode a useful tool on yours.

Forgive me if I'm wrong but does the longer vanes stabilize larger broadheads better than the blazers on the same head. I thought (or read it somewhere) that the blazers work great for expandables and the smaller shorter compact broadheads but that the longer vanes stabilized the larger more conventional broadheads better. It is myth or is there some truth behind it. I'm gonna try the rage expandables this year and up until now all I've used is the 4" dura vanes with a right helica. I'm considering the blazers too. I've was just told not to go with them on my 125 grain muzzys.

I'm in the market for a rangefinder too! I know you guys get tired of the same quesions but here I go again. For the ones that has an angle compensation rangefinder, here is my question. how much of a difference is the point of aim changed on the average bowhunt from level ground (like south georgia) in a tree stand. I know it really will differ depending on how close the target is and how high the stand is. But given my shooting ability (roughly 30 or 40 yards MAX) I'm just trying to eliminate any unneeded accessories on it (ultimately lowering the price). My next question is, does the scan and rain modes come in handy or just another sales gimmic. I want a quality unit but dont have 400 dollars to sink into one. But I do want the best my budget will allow, and that is why I'm asking about the two above mentioned functions. I'm really considering the Nikon 550 but I've been seeing alot of bad talk on them. My other option is the Bushnell Trophy series. Any help is appreciated. (I did read the other "best bang for buck on rangefinder" thread)

I'm considering the Bushnell Trophy myself. I've been debating spending the extra for the Angle Compensation but it is pretty much flat around here and I think it would be money better spent on new arrows personally. I've found it for the 190 ball park looking around. Not to highjack the thread but does anyone see a significant advantage on the scan option? Is is a necessity or luxury on a range finder.

You wont be dissappointed in Nikon. I too have a buckmaster and love it. I will say this too. The scope is only as good as the rings/base you use. So go with a good quality midranged priced (200-300) scope and some real high quality base/rings and you will not be dissappointed. The Elite 3200 series are nice by Bushnell too. Leupold as well. If you go with a good name brand and get the better quality unit you will be happy. Just don't settle for the 99 dollar special at the local walmart and expect great things. I speak first hand on that.

I purchased the flatliner and like it 10 fold over the standard side pin sights. Larger sight picture for sure, and the no tool sight pin adjustment is nice too.