Are traditional archers an endangered species?


Darryl

Recommended Posts

I don't think their endangered. I know quite a few traditional archery guys. Some of them are so die hard they don't hunt with any other weapon. Yep...even during spring turkey hunting season. Finding equipment isn't easy if you're shopping at stores, on line or whatever that cater tall the masses. You need to shop at places like 3 Rivers Archery. About all they handle is traditional archery gear. Here's their web site link 3Rivers Archery Supplies, Traditional Youth Archery Bows and Arrows, and Longbow Hunting BTW...I'll occasionally break out my recurve if I'm hunting does. Won't anymore when my odds are better at hunting mature bucks. Why? Long story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, speaking of the devil. I just was drawn on a special hunt here in Oklahoma, the only thing allowed is traditional. So needless to say, I'm going to be doing ALOT of practicing with the recurve. I need some input, serious input. I don't know beans about it, but love shooting it, what would you'all recommend, aluminums or carbons? Obviously 2 blade broadheads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carbon shafts I think are more forgiving... i spine tested mine shooting them through paper to make sure they'll fly best left to right. I tried to look for cut on contact heads but I had some NAP hellrazors and figured they'd work. best to have the blades at a less steep angle I think too more like woodsman heads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, speaking of the devil. I just was drawn on a special hunt here in Oklahoma, the only thing allowed is traditional. So needless to say, I'm going to be doing ALOT of practicing with the recurve. I need some input, serious input. I don't know beans about it, but love shooting it, what would you'all recommend, aluminums or carbons? Obviously 2 blade broadheads.

You talking about the mcalester hunt? If so Jeremie did that a year or two ago, I'm sure he'd give you some advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need some input, serious input. I don't know beans about it, but love shooting it, what would you'all recommend, aluminums or carbons? Obviously 2 blade broadheads.

Ok...take this for what it's worth :D I shoot carbons with my recurve...Easton 400's. 400's or 500's should work shooting trad. Why? Accuracy is not an issue with my setup shooting carbons. In the long run it's cheaper. You'll bend a lot of aluminums practicing. Some people on here know Gene & Barry Wensel are friends of mine. The are hardcore trad hunters. I recently asked Gene if he had started shooting carbons yet because previously he hadn't since he had a huge inventory of aluminum arrows. He had finally gone through his inventory of aluminum arrows & switched to carbons. Now as for broadheads...I shoot the 3 blade Wensel Woodsman. They are very similar to the Magnus Snuffer. Both are great 3 blade heads IMO for trad hunting. They are longer (~3") than broadheads you're used to shooting with compounds but with a much lower cutting angle allowing for less resistance, thus better penetration. JMO but 3 blade heads cut holes, 2 blade heads don't. I also throw a lot of weight in the front shooting trad. My trad broadheads weigh 225gr. Works for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok...take this for what it's worth :D I shoot carbons with my recurve...Easton 400's. 400's or 500's should work shooting trad. Why? Accuracy is not an issue with my setup shooting carbons. In the long run it's cheaper. You'll bend a lot of aluminums practicing. Some people on here know Gene & Barry Wensel are friends of mine. The are hardcore trad hunters. I recently asked Gene if he had started shooting carbons yet because previously he hadn't since he had a huge inventory of aluminum arrows. He had finally gone through his inventory of aluminum arrows & switched to carbons. Now as for broadheads...I shoot the 3 blade Wensel Woodsman. They are very similar to the Magnus Snuffer. Both are great 3 blade heads IMO for trad hunting. They are longer (~3") than broadheads you're used to shooting with compounds but with a much lower cutting angle allowing for less resistance, thus better penetration. JMO but 3 blade heads cut holes, 2 blade heads don't. I also throw a lot of weight in the front shooting trad. My trad broadheads weigh 225gr. Works for me.
said a lot of the same thing in my last post but I agree with Al's whole post. I switched to carbons way back when because I was ruining aluminums left and right. look at any broadhead that's cut on contact and specifically designed for traditional bows and it'll be longer for a less steep angle for greater penetration (wensel woodsman, eichler phantom, howard hill head, etc.). I also shoot a good bit of weight up front compared to my compounds. I shoot a 100gr head, 100gr brass insert, and an additional 20gr screw-in weight behind the insert in the shaft. in the back are three 4" feather fletches.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that it all depends upon the draw weight of your bow; I shoot a custom Rocky Mountain take down; 63#@28" off the shelf. I've always used aluminum arrows cut to 28" as I have a 27" draw length. The lighter carbon arrows at such a short length tend to lose kinetic energy outside of 20 or so yards. 2114's maintain speed and kinetic energy within 30 due to the heavier weight; although I never take a shot or have never killed a deer at more than 15 yards. Personal preference plays a key role. If you're a speed freak go with the carbons; if you prefer more thump at closer range stick with aluminums.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.