WStreblo Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 Would like to see what everyone comes up with as far as age and score for these deer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WStreblo Posted September 26, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 Age and Score em More pics are in my 2013-2014 Ohio Bucks photo album Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowhunter97 Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 (edited) Big 10 probably about 4 and about 140-150. Buck with the kickers about 3-3.5 and about 130 i'd say its kinda hard to tell fromjudt those pictures and i havent looked at the ones in the album yet. Edited September 26, 2013 by bowhunter97 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravin R10 man Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 3.5 and 145 2.5 and 130 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted September 26, 2013 Report Share Posted September 26, 2013 First deer 4.5, second deer 2.5. Score on first one upper 140's, second one upper 120's to low 130's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowhunter97 Posted September 27, 2013 Report Share Posted September 27, 2013 Whew i went out on a limb with the scoring. I was hoping yall wouldnt think i was stupid but it seems i judged pretty well lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WStreblo Posted September 28, 2013 Author Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 First deer 4.5, second deer 2.5. Score on first one upper 140's, second one upper 120's to low 130's. Tackle this one... Pic of a pic. My old mans deer. It's all wrinkled cause I keep it in my safety vest on every hunt as my motivation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 I'd guess close to if not just over 170, one heck of a deer there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravin R10 man Posted September 28, 2013 Report Share Posted September 28, 2013 168 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbHunterNY Posted September 30, 2013 Report Share Posted September 30, 2013 Scoring I'm with the others. First one 4.5 and second 3.5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbHunterNY Posted September 30, 2013 Report Share Posted September 30, 2013 Horrible with Score so times by I'm going to say high 170s say 178 gross. Id think you know the scope of that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerClay Posted September 30, 2013 Report Share Posted September 30, 2013 Scoring I'm with the others. First one 4.5 and second 3.5 I'm with you Dan. The non-typ has too many stickers and kickers for a 2.5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TN Bucknasty Posted October 1, 2013 Report Share Posted October 1, 2013 The first has the typical belly and deep neck that meets the brisket of a 4.5 year old. Because there is no sag in his back, I don't see him as being older than that. Score- 145. If you covered up the second deer's rack, I'd swear by the long legs, thin neck, etc. that he was 2.5. Closer to November, he'll beef up a little more and his body might begin match the rack he's sporting which would be more fitting of a 3.5 year old. I'd estimate his score at 120-125. At any rate, he has the potential to be a monster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbHunterNY Posted October 1, 2013 Report Share Posted October 1, 2013 I'm with you Dan. The non-typ has too many stickers and kickers for a 2.5 His rack yea and his head/face. also his brisket blends in too much and chest too deep for 2.5 yrs old. Sure legs still look long, because they don't start to look short until 4.5. Also with the angle and him with front feet I a hole he looks not that deep bodied (top to bottom) just in front of his back legs but definitely more than a 2.5 yr old. That's the reasoning behind my nut ball guessing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Straight Shooter Posted October 2, 2013 Report Share Posted October 2, 2013 The first one looks to be in the 3.5-4.5 range and the other is 2.5-3.5 years old. However, I am not seeing the higher scoring int he 140's to 150's on the first. His G2's aren't that long but he gains some back with his G4's and not more than 15-16" wide. I am guessing he is in the mid 130's. The other deer I'm figuring is in the 115-120 range, he has got a lot of potential and love those kickers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.