.223 for whitetails?


Ultradog

Recommended Posts

How effective is a .223 on white tails?

I know it is the smallest round Minnesota will let you use for deer.

My wife went hunting with me last year and enjoyed hanging out in the stand with me.

We've talked a couple of times about her getting a rifle and trying to take a deer herself.

She's never fired anything bigger than a .22LR so I don't want to over do it on firepower.

I have a couple of extra rifles - 30 30 and 3006 - (I use a ,270)

But I'm thinking those would be a bit big for her.

Want to knock the deer down, not her.:)

Not much brush where we hunt - mostly open - 50-250 yards.

Is it worth plunking down the dough for a 223 or should I try to get her to go for something like a .243.

No hand loading here, just store bought rounds.

I wish I could rent guns somewhere and let her try them first before I plunk our money down.

Just thinking out loud here. Any advice?

Thanks

Jerry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While it is legal here now and we have deer that are not typically much over 200 lbs on the hoof, i personally would probably not take my .223 varmint rifle to hunt deer. A .223 imo is gonna be marginal at best on deer with a skilled shooter. 10 or so years ago the minimum was a .24 here, they changed it to .22 centerfire.

I would step up to a .243 Jerry. Those ranges will be fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info guys. XT Man, thanks for the link too.

Yeah, I figured I was dreaming for a 223 to be real effective.

I have a Norinco 7.62X39 too but those hings are kind of goofy to try to put a scope on.

Maybe I'll start looking for a used 243 for her. Probably wont buy it this year as you know that prices are jacked up this time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, a .223 with the correct load will kill deer. Countless deer fall every year in Oklahoma and Texas to a .223. It probably isn’t the best choice but it is very effective. Keep in mind that deer fall every year to bows, cross bows, and illegally fall to smaller rifles like .22lr, .22 Mag, and .17 HMR. If you buy a premium bullet and make a good shot a .223 will kill a deer, safely to 100 yards.

However, im with the others on this one. To this day I still carry a .243 (and im a 38 year old, 195lb man).. This round has VERY little kick to it compared to most rifle rounds. It is manageable for about any shooter. My niece took her first ever deer at something like 12 years old with my .243. The .243 carries much more energy because of a heavier projectile (100 grn typically). They are proven deer killers. I’ve taken deer at many ranges and even shot an antelope at 286 yards with hand loads. Many deer have fallen to the .243. Its a great round and would serve her well.

As far as ammo, you don’t have to get too expensive with the .243. The Cheap Remington Corelokt or the Winchester Super X are both good rounds for deer hunting. I have tons of hand loads (Hornady BTSP) that i have put together for the .243. However, the Winchester Super X fly just as true and drop deer. They are less than $20 a box..

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My daughters are both well under 5ft and barely 90lbs, even into their 20's, and they both use a Rem 700 in 7-08. They've used it since they were way smaller than they are now with no problems. That would be my first choice, but as has already been said, your .270 shouldn't be much different with a 140gr or smaller bullet. I'd probably just go with that. No sense spending money you don't need to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem with using your rifle is the LOP will be too long likely and may be hard to shoulder. If it were me I would buy a cheaper older rifle like a Savage 110 in the wood stock and have it cut down. They are UGLY guns but shoot true and are very affordable. They are/ were chambered in countless cartridges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem with using your rifle is the LOP will be too long likely and may be hard to shoulder. If it were me I would buy a cheaper older rifle like a Savage 110 in the wood stock and have it cut down. They are UGLY guns but shoot true and are very affordable. They are/ were chambered in countless cartridges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My second daughter (12 last season) was only maybe 65-70 lbs when I took her for our youth hunt last year. She is recoil sensitive, and she shoots my wifes .243 with no problems at all.

nicoolesfirstdeer_zps21ceeb7e.jpg

My oldest was shooting the .243 at 8. She has been shooting my .270 since she was 12. Will agree on the savage suggestion too, typically pretty good shooters and won't break the bank, a pachmayr pad will soften what little recoil. She was 14 when we went to Wyoming, she takes my old model 700 in .270 every chance she gets and leaves here browning a bolt in .243 in the safe.

PICT0043christinaswymulie.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.