Norm Sauceman Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7145711017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanH Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fisherguy Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? by rough measurements he must mean giveing each measurement an extra inch or two, and factoring in a 35"spread lol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest KSNimrod Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? I'm thinking more like 145" Maybe he was using the metric system? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shedhunter Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? I sent the seller an e-mail asking him how he came up with the buck being a 170" deer. Ill let you know when he replies... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shedhunter Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? That seller is also selling this shed. http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vie...ssPageName=WDVW He said the shed scores 85 4/8. Then he said the deer would score 200". That means if the other side is roughly the same size, the buck has a 29" spread. Thats one wide spread! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Sauceman Posted April 1, 2005 Author Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? This is what I sent and what I got back>>LOL I think you need to re-think..65" on one side does not mean 105" on the second side and make it a 170" buck. You will not get $150 for a 4 point rack of 65". Sorry. Nice find though, It sounds like it has some memories with you and your Dad." ya i was thinking you got inside and outside spread Don't think they know how to score at all... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LDB Posted April 1, 2005 Report Share Posted April 1, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? According to his own measurements, the shed that he said would score 85 4/8 actually scores 74 4/8. It's an awesome shed, but not even close to 200 class. It looks like he doesn't realize there are only 4 circumference measurements, regardless of the number of tines. Math might also not be his strongest suit. I have trouble believing the first shed would score much more than high 60's (being generous). Great shed, but not 170-class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shedhunter Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? He replied to my question as well, he was counting the inside and outside spread! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saskbuck40 Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? hahahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil hunter Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? scroll down a little on the page and it says he was scoring inside and outside spread.lol. It was a nice try though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest shedhunter Posted April 2, 2005 Report Share Posted April 2, 2005 Re: Really??? 170\"?????? Maybe he meant to do it on purpose? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.