Another '05 Bow Rankings


dogdoc

Recommended Posts

Re: Another \'05 Bow Rankings

[ QUOTE ]

Difference in the Mathews was that it was overpriced and the draw cycle was worse than the Hoyt or the Bow Tech.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to know what that guy likes in a draw cycle. confused.gif Not sure about the overpriced part. About 80% of the shops around here have Mathews, Hoyt and BowTech all at the same price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Another \'05 Bow Rankings

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Difference in the Mathews was that it was overpriced and the draw cycle was worse than the Hoyt or the Bow Tech.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd like to know what that guy likes in a draw cycle. confused.gif Not sure about the overpriced part. About 80% of the shops around here have Mathews, Hoyt and BowTech all at the same price.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hoyt and Bowtech probably had a higher advertising budget with OL than mathews grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Buck Magnet 007

Re: Another \'05 Bow Rankings

The noise part is a shocker to me. A test was done with the top three bows using dB meters and the Switchback was actually the quietest of the three beating out the Allegiance by .1 dB's.

Draw cycle is what I expected. The Hoyt doesn't have as hard of a cam producing the speed that the Allegiance does. The S-Back in third seems right to me. If the S-Back was a new bow, it is gonna have one terrible draw cycle. My buddy just got a S-Back this year and when he first got it, I drew it back and shot it a few times and thought that it was one of the worst draw cycles I had ever felt. After a few months of shooting, the bow wore in and the draw cycle is MUCH better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Another \'05 Bow Rankings

Being a Browning guy to the core..............I gotta wonder why they stacked all those other bows up against a Browning that's been out for about 3 years??????? confused.gif The Mirage 1.5 is/was a great bow. But the state-of-the-art Browning is the Illusion. I think I'd put more credibility into their little list if they were comparing apples to apples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tyshe17

Re: Another \'05 Bow Rankings

I am a little out of date I know, but does anyone have the head to head test from 2004. Just wondering what all has changed and if my Pheonix is included since Parker didnt really come out with a new top of the line this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Another \'05 Bow Rankings

I don't think you'll ever have a fair test or a test that actually means anything in any of those magazine. As careful as they say they are, there will always be some kind of bias IMHO.

I'd stick to what I always say: Go shoot a bunch and decide what's best for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.