PAbowhunter4life Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Can we please stop using the word "stuck" in our thread titles? We have enough pressure on us from antis as it is. If they were to log on here and see "I stuck a buck", "I stuck a doe", "Stuck one but lost it", that'd be bad news for us. Saying we "stuck" a deer makes it sound like we don't aim or worry about where we hit a deer. Might give the wrong people the wrong impression that we just let an arrow go, hit the deer wherever, then follow the blood. If we find it, cool, if not, oh well. I don't know about you guys, but that's not how I want to perceived. Can't we just say "I hit a doe", or "I arrowed a doe", something like that, stuck just sounds to brutal IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAbowhunter4life Posted October 31, 2004 Author Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I am not tip toeing for them, I just don't think we should give them any more ammo than they have. You said it best, knowing we are hunting is enough to tick them off, why throw more wood in the fire. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
need2hunt Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I agree with J.B. on this one... they don't like us no matter what verbage we use... stuck, harvested, killed... doesn't matter... might as well not post any pics of our deer either, just in case there watching Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
need2hunt Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. Also I'ld say your reading waaay to far into the word "stuck" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illinoisbowhunter Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. [ QUOTE ] I agree with J.B. on this one... they don't like us no matter what verbage we use... stuck, harvested, killed... doesn't matter... might as well not post any pics of our deer either, just in case there watching [/ QUOTE ] Ditto" It all means the same thing, to each his own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogdoc Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. i agree---after I stick a buck I'd like to stick an anti I don't give a rat's arse what the anti's think. todd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrud Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. Man, I done jacked that deer up! My Hoyt kicked it's a....(fill in letters) ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckee Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. [ QUOTE ] Can we please stop using the word "stuck" in our thread titles? [/ QUOTE ] OK, from now on it's poked guys...don't forget (just having fun...but) There is something we all need to realize about these anti-hunting groups like PETA, ELF, etc. ...They are not just against huntingHunting is just an easy target. They in fact are against the killing of any and all animals, and against the eating of all meat and all meat bi-products. These groups have their sights aimed low right now on purpose...(1) To win sympathetic hearts, to get recruits, (2) to win small wars first and set some precedences (3) to gain power through (1) and (2) and eventually brainwash the masses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gator Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. [ QUOTE ] i agree---after I stick a buck I'd like to stick an anti I don't give a rat's arse what the anti's think. todd [/ QUOTE ] What he said!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VTbowman Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I must agree with the man who posted. Although, reguardless of how we say it, the antis' will not like it. However, its the undecided folks we should try not to offend or deter from us. We can use ALL the help we can get. Being less then sensitive to ALL people can only hurts us. Now I know we are all proud and die-hard hunters, but we can be respectfull to others. If by not being as graphic, or using words like "harvest" vs. killed, stuck, wacked, etc, then so be it. WE know what "harvests" means... LOL Plus "harvest" says to the undecided folks that it was done in efforts to conservation, and management. Not a lust for blood and killing. Like the antis try to say we do, or are. Anti's are a lost cause and the enemy, NEVER forget that! But they use these type of other words, terms, or verbage to sway the undecided folks. Its not a lot to ask to keep our image healthy and family-like, not barbaric murderers and killers... WE are NOT killers, or murderers, we are hunters and conservationist. JMO but I agree with him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horst Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. Deads dead, it all means the same thing no matter how yoyu try to pretty it up, the antis and the undecideds know this as well as we do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted October 31, 2004 Report Share Posted October 31, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. If the antis dont like it they need to go somewhere else. Really dont think this site is for them in the first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowtechTurkeyHunter Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I dont come here too apease the antis lol matter fact this is where I come too get away from that crap I coulda stuck a doe tonight but chose not too because of the shott location .... I didnt whack her because she was facing me and never produced a broadside shot .... I would have enjoyed killing her and then cookin her up for dinner ... hope no antis where offended but 99.9% of the REAL ppl that come too these boards like that sorta thing LOL ok ive had my fun with the anti's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAbowhunter4life Posted November 1, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. Thanks man. Personally, the whole reason I disagree with the word "stuck" is because that is not what I do. I have far too much RESPECT for animals than to just go out and "stick" one. I spend countless hours shooting my bow to assure I get a good hit and to assure that I don't "stick" one in the arse, or gut, etc. . For those of you who go out and "stick" deer, all the more power to ya. Me, I plan on harvesting a deer and placing an arrow in the boiler room. While everyone is going to argue that they "stick" deer in the boiler room all the time, fact of the matter is, you are "sticking" something that you are supposed to have respect for. I AM NOT TRYING TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT IN ANYWAY, & I AM NOT TRYING TO PLEASE ANY ANTI'S. I just thought that all of the bowhunters on here had a lot more respect for the animals they go after Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimT Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I know where your coming from, but I also care careless what the antis think. They need to be stuck on there own planet similar to earth. I bet they do not last a week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAbowhunter4life Posted November 1, 2004 Author Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I AM NOT TRYING TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT IN ANYWAY, & I AM NOT TRYING TO PLEASE ANY ANTI'S. I just thought that all of the bowhunters on here had a lot more respect for the animals they go after See that phrase above, that is from a previous post. Maybe I should "stick" a book in front of your face, cause apparently you can't read. As for voting for Kerry, yeah, that's what I am saying to do, you got me. I'll never post another thread again on here because I am a "boohoo cry baby". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
007hunter Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I gotta agree with you PAbowhunter. I don't mind if others say it as its their business but you won't catch me saying it. And its not b/c of the antis, I personally feel its a lack of respect for the animal...As for camels reply, it was rather unneccessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griz Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. Ok gang here's my opinion.... I don't want to tick anybody off here.... The way I look at it this is a hunting forum. Not a forum for anti's.... I know as a hunter I practice hard on shooting and keeping my equipment at it's best so when the time come's I'm ready to go..... It doesn't matter if you shot, harvest, hit, stick or stuck an animal. Dead is dead. You took that animal out that you as a hunter worked your but off for so you can provide you or your family with meat. When I take a animals life I will always Thank the Lord above for what he has giving me... So I say the heck with the anti's and for what they think..... Those people are whacked in the head anyways..... That's just my opinion.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. Many of you talk like there's only two kinds of people that might visit this forum.......hunters and anti-hunters. I think you are forgetting the most politically important voting segment, and that is the non-hunting people. I'm talking about the vast majority of the public who have no real hard opinions on the subject of hunting, but may visit here just to see what all the hoopla is all about. Now I really don't think they would jump right on the anti-hunting bandwagon if they saw the word "stuck" used here, but I do think it's important to remember that our posts and replies should be reasonably appropriate. I haven't really seen anything here that would turn a non-hunter into an antihunter yet, and it would probably be a good idea to keep it that way. Doc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohiobucks Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. [ QUOTE ] Me, I plan on harvesting a deer and placing an arrow in the boiler room. [/ QUOTE ] Do you really think "placing an arrow in the boiler room" is what the anti's want to hear? Better rephrase that sentence before one of them starts to jump all over you!! BTW, I went out yesterday and didn't stick anything, I hope to stick one this week though! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZooBear Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. No matter how you say it, corn and beans are harvested. Animals are killed. There is no shame in killing a deer for food. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rhinodog Posted November 1, 2004 Report Share Posted November 1, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. [ QUOTE ] Thanks man. Personally, the whole reason I disagree with the word "stuck" is because that is not what I do. I have far too much RESPECT for animals than to just go out and "stick" one. I spend countless hours shooting my bow to assure I get a good hit and to assure that I don't "stick" one in the arse, or gut, etc. . For those of you who go out and "stick" deer, all the more power to ya. Me, I plan on harvesting a deer and placing an arrow in the boiler room. While everyone is going to argue that they "stick" deer in the boiler room all the time, fact of the matter is, you are "sticking" something that you are supposed to have respect for. I AM NOT TRYING TO BE POLITICALLY CORRECT IN ANYWAY, & I AM NOT TRYING TO PLEASE ANY ANTI'S. I just thought that all of the bowhunters on here had a lot more respect for the animals they go after [/ QUOTE ] It sounds like you're trying to be PC to me. We KILL deer. It's not an ear of corn, it's a deer. You should hear what I tell people that ask me if I "caught" a deer. I respect mother nature for providing me with such a tasty animal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravin R10 man Posted November 2, 2004 Report Share Posted November 2, 2004 Re: No Offense, But................. I always get a kick outta Rodger Raglins Take on this one....I wanna "let the air otta that sucker"!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.