distance to target from tree stand?


Guest finsnfur

Recommended Posts

Guest jduffy03

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

[ QUOTE ]

First you have to understand that an arrow or any other object traveling a horizontal distance is only going to fall at the constant rate based on gravitational pull. So that means that if your target is only 20 yards from the base of your tree, the arrow will drop only by "x" amount from gravity, regardless if you are on the ground, 20' up, 30' up, or 200' up. So, regardless of how high you are up the tree, you will want to shoot the deer for 20 yards. However, if you use a rangefinder (not the self adjusting one refered too earlier), it will read "20 yards" at the base of the tree, "21.08 yards" at 20 feet up the tree, "22.36 yards" at 30' up the tree, and "69.6 yards" at 200' up the tree (my exagerated example).

In a nut shell, always take the horizontal distance from you to the animal as your aiming yardage, not the diagonal yardage. What the self correcting rangefinders do is caluculate the horizontal distance based on the diagonal distance that a normal range finder would shoot.

What I don't get is the fascination with this technology with today's bows. Unless you are bow hunting say, in the mountains for a goat that is on a cliff either way below or above you, why would you even care about the correction needed? The vast majority of us are hunting whitetails, on reasonably sloped (or flat) ground and are perched anywhere from 15' to 25' feet up (OK, there are some 30' nuts out there too). The distance between horizontal and vertical distances is not significant enough to worry about when today's bows shoot so fast and flat. Hold the 20 yard pin on and you've got a dead dear from 10 yards out to 25 yards.

I think these self adjusting rangefinders have a place in hunting, but I think the bulk of the bowhunters would be better served to take the keep it simple method.

[/ QUOTE ]

I couldn't agree more!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PAT_PATTERSON

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

[ QUOTE ]

I believe that one to be true. Most people will tell you to simply bend at the waist.

[/ QUOTE ]

The most common reason for bending at the waist is not dropping your bow arm. When you shoot from an elevated stand and drop your bow arm to sight your target you change the string or peep angle in relation to your eye and thus changing your point of impact. Shoot higher or lower in other words. Maintain good form ,draw as if on flat ground come to your normal anchor, bend at the waist to get on your Target, aim and shoot. I also agree with the older bow (slower speed theory) will have more arc in arrow flight and toady's faster bow are more forgiven in distance judging. But good form is the key to consistent shooting, so practice, practice and practice some more from elevated stands

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

basic vector physics!!! when shooting at an angle, you have a horizontal vector and a verticle vector. To gauge the drop of your arrow, you want to use the time it takes to cover the horiazontal distance. This is why you use the horizontal distance, not the hypotenuse. And the same if you are shooting at an upward angle.

Pick up a 1st level physics book, and go to the chapters on vectors. It will give you some examples.

Looks like my physics degree is good for something!!!!

--rossman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

[ QUOTE ]

Hey Tominator, I don't want to be critical of your mathematical sifurin but isn't 21 feet 7yards and 7 yards squared is 49? Just thought I'd ask, being a teacher and all I didn't want you to error on the forum. No ill feelings, just askin'

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, you are correct sir. I stand corrected. I got 3 stuck in my brain when I converted feet to yards. crazy.gifblush.gif

That deer would actually be 21.18962 yards away. grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Hey Tominator, I don't want to be critical of your mathematical sifurin but isn't 21 feet 7yards and 7 yards squared is 49? Just thought I'd ask, being a teacher and all I didn't want you to error on the forum. No ill feelings, just askin'

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, you are correct sir. I stand corrected. I got 3 stuck in my brain when I converted feet to yards. crazy.gifblush.gif

That deer would actually be 21.18962 yards away. grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you DID use your "theroy" when you missed that 140" at 12 yards......MORON! grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Hey Tominator, I don't want to be critical of your mathematical sifurin but isn't 21 feet 7yards and 7 yards squared is 49? Just thought I'd ask, being a teacher and all I didn't want you to error on the forum. No ill feelings, just askin'

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, you are correct sir. I stand corrected. I got 3 stuck in my brain when I converted feet to yards. crazy.gifblush.gif

That deer would actually be 21.18962 yards away. grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you DID use your "theroy" when you missed that 140" at 12 yards......MORON! grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Then tell me, Professor, why didn't you use this simple black and white theroy on Mr. 140" 2 years ago? Hmmm? Hmmm?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that the Danville spelling of theory or something? Hmmmmm, Mr. Steward, sir, hmmmmmmm.

And I'm the mow-ron? grin.gif

AF

DB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Hey Tominator, I don't want to be critical of your mathematical sifurin but isn't 21 feet 7yards and 7 yards squared is 49? Just thought I'd ask, being a teacher and all I didn't want you to error on the forum. No ill feelings, just askin'

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep, you are correct sir. I stand corrected. I got 3 stuck in my brain when I converted feet to yards. crazy.gifblush.gif

That deer would actually be 21.18962 yards away. grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe you DID use your "theroy" when you missed that 140" at 12 yards......MORON! grin.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

Then tell me, Professor, why didn't you use this simple black and white theroy on Mr. 140" 2 years ago? Hmmm? Hmmm?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that the Danville spelling of theory or something? Hmmmmm, Mr. Steward, sir, hmmmmmmm.

And I'm the mow-ron? grin.gif

AF

DB

[/ QUOTE ]

Just trieing to spel two you're leavel, mow-ron. grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: distance to target from tree stand?

Point is that something traveling straight down doesn't have to compensate for anything where as something traveling in a slight to major horizontal direction is still being pulled down. The sharper the angle down, the less compensation you have to make for the arch of gravity's pull.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.