robk Posted November 26, 2004 Report Share Posted November 26, 2004 i looked at the rifleman from leupold and went to the nikon buckmaster. it produced much better light transmission than the rifleman and it was a crisper clearer picture with 88%light transmission if you want a good scope take a look at the buckmaster. or another would be the 3200 from bushnell or the burris full field 2. they are all clearer than the rifleman rob k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnf Posted November 29, 2004 Report Share Posted November 29, 2004 Re: Leupold Rifleman I've got a Nikon Pro staff 3-6 X 40 and a Simmons 8pt. The 8pt is great in good light, but in that last 20-30 minutes of light it is almost worthless. With the Pro-staff I can still see good enough to shoot with moonlight alone. But I don't Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robk Posted December 1, 2004 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2004 Re: Leupold Rifleman take a look at he bushnell 3200 elite and see if that will make you smile and also check out the burris as well the light transmission on both is right aroudn 95% and will definately make you happy. i to have been trying to decide and i think i am going with a 3x9x50 for a little more light gethering myself instead of a 40 mm objective. good luck rob k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robk Posted December 3, 2004 Author Report Share Posted December 3, 2004 Re: Leupold Rifleman the atec is the only simmons scope i would buy from them my dad loves his and wouldn't trade it for the world rob k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silentgate Posted December 3, 2004 Report Share Posted December 3, 2004 Re: Leupold Rifleman For the money, you can't beat a Nikon Pro Staff! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.