Rifles


LifeNRA

Recommended Posts

Re: Rifles

[ QUOTE ]

the 223 doesnt have enough velocity to ethically harvest a deer.

[/ QUOTE ]

In fear of starting an "off-topic" arguement...I'll keep this short and sweet. How much "velocity" does it take to harvest a deer? Most .223's will shoot alot faster (and I mean ALOT ) than a bow and most bows will get clean pass throughs.

If the bullet is well placed...it will drop a 300# buck...end of discussion!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

[ QUOTE ]

In fear of starting an "off-topic" arguement...I'll keep this short and sweet. How much "velocity" does it take to harvest a deer? Most .223's will shoot alot faster (and I mean ALOT ) than a bow and most bows will get clean pass throughs.

If the bullet is well placed...it will drop a 300# buck...end of discussion!

[/ QUOTE ] You cannot compare rifles to bows. Bows kill because they cause a deer to bleed to death.Rifles kill with energy. Would you shoot an elk with a .223? I wouldn't, but I definatly would with my bow. Velocity does not kill. Expended energy does. The .223 is not a big enough bullet to have the energy required to "consistantly" kill deer. There is just not much room for error with a .223.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

First...read the first line of my first post!

Second...I wasn't the one who brought "velocity" into the equation!

Third...the bow and gun both kill using energy, and believe it or not, they both kill by bleeding.

Forth...I do not use a .223 (don't even own one) for deer, however; I've seen a guy shoot a mature doe at 150 yards with a 55gr. bullet from a .22-250 and flat out pancake her where she stood.

The question was "If anyone used .223 for deer". And like it or not, it will kill a deer!

On a side note, I can shoot my .22-250 prob. 50 times better than the "average" hunter can shoot a "deer" cal. rifle. I will not use this gun for deer hunting, but Iam confident enough to know if I wanted to...I could easily kill a deer with it...and ETHICS have nothing to do with it. wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

I think that you need to add another part to your equation, what kind of deer are you shooting? In the northern states and Canada, the average size of a good Whitetail buck has to be 50-60 lbs heavier then a Texas deer, and deer over 250 are shott all the time. That said, I would safely say it takes a lot more to kill the bigger animals..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

Ive seen deer shot with a .22 rifle go down within 40 yrds of being shot.If the question was can you kill a deer with a .223 then the answer would be yes you certainly can.Id think it would depend on a lot on how close you are to the animal and where you put your bullet.Deer arent exactly armor plated no matter how big they are.A higher caliber would be a better choice like you all said but it doesnt really take a lot to kill a deer at close range.

[ QUOTE ]

In my opinion, anyone who uses anything less than a .243 caliber is hunting unethically!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

In my opinion shooting at deer a 1/4 mile away with an elephant gun isnt ethical either but a lotta guys do it grin.gifDragging ethics into these conversations is always fun isnt it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

Good reason it is not legal here to hunt with anything smaller than .24 caliber. Even if it were legal here, a .223 in my opinion is just not a "deer caliber", and should not be considered as such.

Sure a well placed shot will take a deer down, even with a .17 or a .22 I am sure a skilled marskman could kill a deer, but why risk it. Step up to a .243 and be confident in knowing you have enough to do the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

No one said Snapper brought up velocity, and I said energy kills not velocity. A 100gr fmj shot at 3500 fps will not do nearly the damage as a 100gr CoreLokt. Yes, a bullet causes a deer to bleed, but the energy released increases tissue damage by at least two fold if not more. A .223 and a 22-250 are not in the same league, and should not be compared. A 223 with a 55gr psp has 1282 foot pounds of energy at the muzzle. A 22-250 with the same bullet has 1654. In my mind using a sub par firearm to hunt deer is unethical. Will a .223 kill a deer? Yup. Will I ever use one? No. All in good fun Snapper,,,, Just an easy difference of opinions. Without that, this forum would be boring eh... wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

.223 - shoot for the head, sniper style, then yell out HEADSHOT as loud as you can when it drops...

I use a 7mm Mag or a .54 cal ML for big game, my .223 is for coyotes and the occasional LDS missionary that wanders too close or comes by the house too late at night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

[ QUOTE ]

Snapper,,,, Just an easy difference of opinions.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually there isn't a difference in opinions...I wouldn't use the cal. either for deer.

When someone asks if anyone uses a certain cal....instead of getting responses that he/she asked for, all Monday night quarterbacks jump in and say things like "not big enough" "not ethical to use" blah blah blah.

My point, the cal. will and has dropped many deer in the past. Will I use it...NO!

Someone would get the same responses (just a complete 180) if he/she would have posted..."Anyone use a 378 HH Mag for deer?" smirk.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

[ QUOTE ]

I enjoy getting other peoples opinions. Sometimes I agree sometimes I dont.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree...I like seeing others opinions. But the orginal post didn't ask for an opinion...asked if anyone used the gun for deer. Opinions are just that...opinions. But if the FACTS differ from your opinion...then its not an opinion, is it?

Ok, lets start over! wink.gif

1. Do I use a .223 for deer? NO

2. Will it kill a deer? YES

3. Would I use one for deer? Not if I had other options.

#3 is the kicker...maybe someone doesn't have access to any other cal. and can shoot a .223 really well. Now this person because of asking a question feels like they can't go hunting because its unethical to use the only gun he/she has. frown.gif

BTW...I'm done with this post, gave my opinion and answered the post. grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Rifles

when people mention velocity and actualy energy for knockdown power, i think they are getting a little bit off subject.... in regards to velocity - bow, muzzle loader, both shoot slower than a .223 - speed isn't really the issue, a .22 shoots faster than a bow too, i wouldn't use that for deer hunting, but, I have seen the fish & game here in utah use a ruger 10/22 to kill a deer with a shot to the head in a residence area. yes a .223 can kill a deer, I wouldn't use one - doesn't make it wrong if you want to do it - people mention that it would take longer to kill the deer, well, yes, but so does a bow... no need for the string of posts about maybe you instant-killed a deer with a bow - 9 times out of 10 a bow hunter shoots a deer and then tracks the blood trail to find it unless he actually sees where it ran off to and dropped

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.