007hunter Posted April 18, 2007 Report Share Posted April 18, 2007 Anyone got any experience with them? Lets hear the good the bad and the ugly!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 Never used them, can't comment one way or the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Washi Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 I do not like the one I own. Then again I think it only cost $30 and came with free binoculars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoyt03 Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 They look decent appearance wise, but I have never used one so can't help ya out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeramie Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 I have a 6x18x50mm on a .243 (Ruger M77) I rigged for Varmint and plinking. I also have a 3x9x40mm on a .22lr (savage V10). Its not the best quality scope you'll ever put your eye to but for the money they are much better than Tasco or BSA. They have held Zero very well even after spending time in the closet and under the bed. With the .243 Im shooting 20oz soda bottles at 200yds. I also killed a bunch of tree rats with the .22lr and that scope has treated me well too. They dont have the "Yellow" you get with a really cheap scope such as a BSA. And they gather more light then something like a Tasco. Personally I dont think they are that bad of a scope. I wouldn't mind topping all my lead slingers with a Burris but chances are.... that isn't going to happen. The only gripe I have is eye relief. Honestly it isn't bad. It just takes a little more tweaking to get it to your liking. Once you're there you're there. For they money they are a good scope.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 Have never looked through those redhead scopes, but seems I remember reading somewhere that the scope you mention there is comparable to the cheaper bushnell lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted April 19, 2007 Report Share Posted April 19, 2007 Have never looked through those redhead scopes, but seems I remember reading somewhere that the scope you mention there is comparable to the cheaper bushnell lines. I wouldn't mind topping all my lead slingers with a Burris but chances are.... that isn't going to happen. Would suggest the nikon lines like the buckmaster or the monarch over the burris fullfield II scopes, they are brighter and clearer in my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.