VermontHunter Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 Steve B. asked me to post this for him so here it is folks .. ;) A little history lesson: It's just a short one, only 6 questions. If you don't know the answer make your best guess. You don't need paper or anything. Answer all the questions before looking at the answers. Who said it? 1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." A. Karl Marx B. Adolph Hitler C. Joseph Stalin D. None of the above 2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...and to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity." B. Mussolini C. Idi Amin D. None of the Above 3) "(We)...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people." A. Nikita Khrushev B. Josef Goebbels C. Boris Yeltsin D. None of the above 4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own...in order to create this common ground." A. Mao Tse Dung B. Hugo Chavez C. Kim Jong Il D. None of the above 5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed." A. Karl Marx B. Lenin C. Molotov D. None of the above 6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched." A. Pinochet B. Milosevic C. Saddam Hussein D. None of the above Answers: (1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004 (2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007 (3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007 (4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007 (5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007 (6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005 Be afraid. Be very, very afraid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeStandBowHunter Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 You can find that same email on Urban Legends.com. Below in quotes is what they had to say...Although I despise Hilary Clinton, it would suck to know that the media and the WWW takes what I said and turns it around. I read her exact comments and they didn't even come close to what was said in that email. The above words were indeed uttered publicly by U.S. Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at various times and places, but they have been stripped out of their original context, edited, and misrepresented to forge a case for Clinton holding "Marxist" views. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan_Til_I_Die Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 I too don't like to parse phrases to get some particular desired result, and I think that's clearly what is happening here. But......that doesn't change the fact that HRC clearly believes in many of the principles of Marxism/Socialism. Universal government controlled healthcare being a prime example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texan_Til_I_Die Posted November 19, 2007 Report Share Posted November 19, 2007 Another example - she wants to cut energy consumption by 20 percent by 2020 and use renewable energy to generate 25 percent of the nation's electricity by 2025. That's all well and good until she lays out her strategy to pay for this project. She said her solution would cost $150 billion over 10 years and that one-third would be financed from the establishment of a $50 billion Strategic Energy Fund paid for by oil companies. Let me translate that. $100 billion would be paid by us taxpayers, and $50 billion would be paid by consumers through the increased costs of fuel. Can anyone say $5.00 a gallon for gas? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckee Posted November 20, 2007 Report Share Posted November 20, 2007 Poor, Poor Hillary She's always getting picked on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebeilgard Posted November 21, 2007 Report Share Posted November 21, 2007 ever notice how a politician ALWAYS says things are taken out of contex? so, why don't they ever explain what the "contex" should have been. point is, they said what they said, and now want a shadow to hide in.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.