TreeStandBowHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Dude, what are you talking about . How old are you ? Are you OK . Do you need help What exactly are you saying Do you need me to beat somebody up for you i rely wish i new wat was going on in this form. I m confusd. Sombdy help me if anyting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckee Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) what did they say Brian ??..I don't understand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fisherguy Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) well if you think you are being threatened maybe bring ot to the attention fo a moderator and tell them exactly what was sent to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohiobucks Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) It came from this post...... Why limit someone to only posting to new topics? Wanna see my new purty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbonhunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) HEy hunter shoot me a Pm with the guilty guys please. There is no excuse for that crap and if the mods wont deal with it i would be glad too. got to remember bud that when you are dealing with a forum like this people tend to like to show how big and bad they can be. (I'm shure I've done it before...ahem politics) I'd say just keep on posting about what-ever, when-ever you want. No where in the rules does it say...only post to recent topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Sauceman Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Usually when a post is more than a month or so old it is OLD and no longer a topic.... If you look at when the post was LAST posted and when YOU posted it was March of 04 to Jan. of 05.. THAT'S 10 MONTHS!! I think you should not dig so deep into the posts bud...they are considered OLD and just for searching back on information gathered in the post... You replied to a DEAD post in other words.. There is no sense in replting to post that have had NO ACTIVITY in 10 MONTHS!! Do you see what I am saying??? If you want to go back 10 months and dig up DEAD posts, go ahead, by all means..but you will get harrassed by folks about it...it is like hearing OLD news. I hope I am making sense here.. I have my filter set on like 30 days old posts..There is no sense in diccussing almost year-old posts that have not been visited in a year. Understand? Clear as mud? Just set your filter for 30 day old posts...If you want to search for something specific, fine but you do not have to reply to those..Just open up a new topic and see what is new. You seem to be a bright person, don't wear your feelings on your sleeve...take what folks are telling you, find what is wrong and fix it. Most folks don't like non-active, year old posts to be opened..it is simple as that. If you feel you have to open one up just remember, it was an old subject, discussed and dead and the folks here were through with it..especially if it has not been opened or replied to in a YEAR... Start a new one, with new and useful information and let's all be friends..OK? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaDeerHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) i have been seeing some old posts dug up and wondered what was going on. But hey I don't mind it because it is new to some of us to! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fisherguy Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Carbonhunter are you saying things can get heated in the political forum?? I have never noticed that LMBO. JMO but if you search out an old post and you feel the need to respond to it why not; as long as you aren't causing trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VermontHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Now I understand where all of the old post are coming from...Hmmm.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckbuster11 Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Personally it does not matter to me what posts anyone responds to. If they are old and I dont want to read them again then I just ignore them. Maybe the mods have a different opinion, but thats fine. Either way, if someone is actually threatening you over something as silly as that then maybe they should be the ones not posting anymore, not you. JMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fisherguy Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Ummm ok...all i see is you saying you didn't think it was funny, and the others ignoring you. Your point is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VermontHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) What the...????? Now I really haven't a clue as to whats going on in here.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carbonhunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) [ QUOTE ] Usually when a post is more than a month or so old it is OLD and no longer a topic.... If you look at when the post was LAST posted and when YOU posted it was March of 04 to Jan. of 05.. THAT'S 10 MONTHS!! I think you should not dig so deep into the posts bud...they are considered OLD and just for searching back on information gathered in the post... You replied to a DEAD post in other words.. There is no sense in replting to post that have had NO ACTIVITY in 10 MONTHS!! Do you see what I am saying??? If you want to go back 10 months and dig up DEAD posts, go ahead, by all means..but you will get harrassed by folks about it...it is like hearing OLD news. I hope I am making sense here.. I have my filter set on like 30 days old posts..There is no sense in diccussing almost year-old posts that have not been visited in a year. Understand? Clear as mud? Just set your filter for 30 day old posts...If you want to search for something specific, fine but you do not have to reply to those..Just open up a new topic and see what is new. You seem to be a bright person, don't wear your feelings on your sleeve...take what folks are telling you, find what is wrong and fix it. Most folks don't like non-active, year old posts to be opened..it is simple as that. If you feel you have to open one up just remember, it was an old subject, discussed and dead and the folks here were through with it..especially if it has not been opened or replied to in a YEAR... Start a new one, with new and useful information and let's all be friends..OK? [/ QUOTE ] Umm who cares what people do and dont like........if we are going to do things like this than you might as well Delete half of the posts in here since most of them are just repetitive, just post a link to the old post pertaining to the subject and lock up the post. Looking back at old things isnt so bad, I tried too find a post for the G2 contender awhile ago but no one would help me out But hey Hunter just did. If people are going to make personal attacks on sothing as stupid as bringing up old posts than things are going to get real heated in here real quick .....I re-read the the rules i signed when we came in here and it says nothing about old posts but it says plenty about personal attacks so I think that should end the conversation right then and there. Old posts can be dealt with real quick by just letting them die and move down the list. I think there has been plenty of talk among us reg. hill jack members about moderators getting a little out of hand and i guess this might be where it comes to head. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gator Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) [ QUOTE ] What the...????? Now I really haven't a clue as to whats going on in here.... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah Luke, makes 2 of us Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fisherguy Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) ok hunter10860 you still haven't explained the last post you made. Are you just trying to cause trouble or did i miss something in it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VermontHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) [ QUOTE ] look at the **** date dude look when i posted it [/ QUOTE ] I give up !!!! I really do..... ...I have no clue as to where this is going and could really give 2 hoots.....It's all rederick and I think it's a simple attention getting ploy for sympothy...I'm not bitting and someone needs to grow up real fast... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swamphunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) I am definitely missing something here! I haven't seen anyone be nasty to you hunter10860, I can't speak for the PM's but to be honest with you, I personally doubt it. I have seen a couple guys tease you about your spelling and grammar, but they are calling it like it is! They are only teasing but your spelling and grammar is the worst I have ever seen on here. Sometimes I think you are either kidding or VERY young. I mean I don't think anyone on here has perfect spelling or grammar, but man... your posts are tough to read! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanH Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) I dont get it! Sorry Dude! Hope you can get this figured out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IowaDeerHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) As far as I understand it Hunter has brought up some old posts, some people don't like it others don't care whatsoever. My opinion is if you don't want to read it then don't read it, it will soon shuffle it's way to the bottom. But the thread Ohiobucks gave is one that was newly posted in March of 2004, and Hunter replied to it here in January of 05. Couple people didn't like that. Then he posted the "...redhead" thread that showed he made a new post on a new topic. IMO, you can post to new ones or old ones, and if some people are threatening you then they should be the ones in trouble not you. I would just keep posting and let the mods. know who sent you the PMs and let them take care of it. Just my opinion though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VermontHunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) [ QUOTE ] HEy hunter shoot me a Pm with the guilty guys please. There is no excuse for that crap and if the mods wont deal with it i would be glad too. got to remember bud that when you are dealing with a forum like this people tend to like to show how big and bad they can be. (I'm shure I've done it before...ahem politics) I'd say just keep on posting about what-ever, when-ever you want. No where in the rules does it say...only post to recent topics. [/ QUOTE ] Yep this is a real good way to handle a problem.... I think this kid needs to grow up and accept life for the way it is....now I understand why he gets the attention in school that he refers to if this is the way he responds to negativity......life is harsh and that's just the plain simple truth. Instead of him sitting in front of a computer screen, maybe he needs to experince some real life activities to boost his personality and confidence in stead of worrying about who is and who's not out to get him...JMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DJR Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) I wish there was a clif-note version Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GWSmith Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Hunter...I have been watching a few of your posts and believe I may have figured out what the problem might be...I could be wrong though. Here you said: "this is the real thing guys a real truly post that i made new!!!" A NEW post is something that you think up or have found elsewhere and wanted to see what the replys would be like so you post it here. When you go back and find old posts and reply to them you have not "Made New". I have been on other forums and found out when some people do that they are called "Dumpster Divers". I'm not referring to you as such but just relaying the reasoning behind why some people may be upset with you....again...I may be wrong. I dont have any problems with you doing whatever here....I just hope you take some time and think ahead about what your doing. If you find something particularly cool about an old post Point that out and give us a better understanding about why your have brought it back up....it may be a way that none of us have looked at the topic before. We may not all get along simply because we dont all have the same reason for being here. We are not cookie cutter carbon copies of each other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lil hunter Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) I only saw one of the old posts that you brought back. It was the one in the muzzleloader forum, and you came back sayin somethin about In-line muzzleloaders not being true muzzleloaders, and that all you'll ever shoot is an old sidelock or something similiar. Those aren't your exact words, but it's close. A lot of people were upset about that, and thats why they got onto you. To bring back an OLD post, just to say somethin bad about it, theres no point, and it's only gonna cause trouble Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckee Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) Brian is mad at two moderators. Myself and another for trying to explain to him about dragging up old useless threads. I also told him some of the threads he dragged up were OK, because they were relevant to today also, but many were not. Instead of taking our well intentioned advise on pulling up old useless threads, he got mad instead. I already told Brian, that the only reason I was asking him not to pull up old meaningless threads, was because it made him look a bit foolish. That also made him mad. So Brian, I guess your on your own man. If you drag up any more useless threads and get a ribbing for it, don't come crying to me again about how guys are picking on you, because I've already tried to help you with this and expain it all to you.. You can spell any way you like...I thought we settled that. It doesn't bother me and doesn't break any forum rules. You can also drag up any threads you like from as far back as you wish, but be prepared for the ribbing OK. But if you want to send me PMs cursing me out, then we have a whole new problem. See, I can use the mad face too ...LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Sauceman Posted January 12, 2005 Report Share Posted January 12, 2005 Re: (PLEASE READ) I guess I need to go back to explaining school...I give up...I will see what I can dig up from the archives somewhere... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.