Tetro Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 I set my camera up during Turkey season. Got quite a few pics of deer moving through the shot. About 40 yards in front of the camera a flooded creek lies in front the deer usually travel back and forth along the edge. The camera is set watching one of their trails. here's Gimpy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ravin R10 man Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 very well could be...not real sure because the pic is not real clear..but Im leaning towards 4 legs the more I look at it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Think the far leg is there. Kind of looks like an outline for it to me anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckee Posted June 2, 2008 Report Share Posted June 2, 2008 Heck, I don't even see a stub, where a leg used to be ???? [ATTACH]1393[/ATTACH] Click on Picture to enlarge Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorden Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 I dont know, its really hard to tell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
natethebowhunter Posted June 5, 2008 Report Share Posted June 5, 2008 looks to me like the far leg is there but the close one isnt. i dont see anything coming from the shoulder like usual...idk tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
backwoods07 Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 I agree with Nate, although I had a picture like this in the daytime last year. Turned out the deer did have four legs...I'll try to find the picture and post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aksheephuntress Posted June 6, 2008 Report Share Posted June 6, 2008 ...You know..I don't have any experience looking at game cams...-BUT- -I can't see the other foreleg..but- if it were a 3-legged deer...I wouldn't expect to see one of the back legs cocked at the same time...and her head wouldn't seem right to be carried that high, in that position...- and I would think there would be more pronounced neck /shoulder muscle there, to have compensated....?? ..I think the other leg just isn't showing, somehow... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimT Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 Heck, I don't even see a stub, where a leg used to be ???? [ATTACH]1393[/ATTACH] Click on Picture to enlarge Me either.....??????????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckbuster11 Posted June 7, 2008 Report Share Posted June 7, 2008 Think the far leg is there. Kind of looks like an outline for it to me anyway. Yup. I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.