Lookin at Rangefinders


Guest TennesseeTurkey

Recommended Posts

Guest TennesseeTurkey

I was in Bass Pro lookin at rangefinders and I made the comment to the guy that I wanted an archers choice from nikon until i found out it only went to 100 yrds....well he gave me this lil handy bit-o-information this nikon riflehunter does the angle compensation just like the archers choice up to 100 yards and it goes into standard mode as well going out to 550 yrds.....needless to say he sold me on it so this lil handy thing-a-ma-bob is mine this weekend :Dhttp://www.nikonhunting.com/rangefinders-riflehunter-riflehunter-550-max-1-hd.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TennesseeTurkey
That's because it was designed for ARCHERS not RIFLE HUNTERS .. ;)

Yeah I know but I wanted one until I found out it only went to 100 but I wanted more but with the angle compensation and how I have it ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you find it to be accurate when shooting from an elevated position?

I'm sure Chris is correct about Nikon which I must say surprises me.:confused:

I too considered the archers choice, but could only afford one rangefinder and I also needed one for bear hunting in the mountains of Idaho.

I went with a standard Cabela's VLR (Bushnell) for 169.00 and it does what I need it to. I just have to remember to compensate when I'm in a tree at an extreme angle. If the Nikon does both for a reasonable price then that's great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i have a nikon prostaff 440. i believe the 550 replaced it in nikons lineup. im very happy with it. i've gotten 4 trouble free years from it and personally i think the angle compensation is over rated too. i practice from about 20 feet up regularly so my pins are set with my rangefinder. never had trouble yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think you are making the right choice. Completely believe the range finders claiming to have the angle compensation are no better than any other.

It is my understanding that they measure the length of the laser beam that extends from your rangefinder to the spot you are ranging. If that is the case, then why does elevation matter? Maybe someone else can tell me/us otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wish I would have known that. I'd sold you mine for 150.00, just got rid of my Nikon Archers Choice and didn't have them 4 months. I kept my Bushnell Sports and the heck with that angle compensation. It's bogust and a waste of money for this option IMO, just shoot a tree or something out directly infront of you to ge the exact distance. The clarity between the two is hands down better with the Bushnells, I didn't like the feel of it either in my hands. Anyway, I no longer have a Nikons and will ot buy another set of their rangefinders, B4L!;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used to be a time I would say to go with bushnell, but since they acquired tasco and they refuse to honor tasco's lifetime warranties, and since they have now also acquired simmons as well I would suggest looking at leupolds or nikons. Would opt to not get the angle compensating rangefinder either, don't see the need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.