skooba Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Givan Posted August 3, 2009 Report Share Posted August 3, 2009 Hard to say about the one on the right because I cant tell how wide he is or what his other side looks like. I think the one in the middle thats looking at the camera would be upper 120s. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skooba Posted August 4, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Here's another pic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ethan Givan Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Im gonna guess that the second buck will be in the mid to upper 120s. Now that I can see that first buck from the side as well im gonna change my first guess and say he is more in the 130 range. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunterwebb Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 is there 3 or 5 buck 3 looks really nice i say high 120 and mid 130 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorden Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 Those are some nice deer, they will be awesome in a year or two Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stone Cold Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 I will agree with the 120's to 130's! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7mm wsm Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 I agree withe others u can expect the 120's give or take !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JKAPP01 Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 that 2nd photo is not one i personally like to judge. views from the back with ears back can be deceiving.....130" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smo Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 I'd say around 110". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom2008 Posted August 4, 2009 Report Share Posted August 4, 2009 115" to 120". They are great deer none the less and still have lots of room to grow if you don't have a chance to get them this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.ALLEN.IA Posted August 6, 2009 Report Share Posted August 6, 2009 I dont' know about score, but from what I see on a regular basis- I'd be happy to see them under my stand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nickel Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 I would say 125 to 135 tops. Nice looking bucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterBlake Posted August 8, 2009 Report Share Posted August 8, 2009 I agree with Nickel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strut10 Posted August 10, 2009 Report Share Posted August 10, 2009 105" for the near one. 115" for the second one. The one in the background on the right looks to be right in the same class as the near two. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly Posted August 14, 2009 Report Share Posted August 14, 2009 115" to 120". They are great deer none the less and still have lots of room to grow if you don't have a chance to get them this year. agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danthehuntinman Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I would guess they would be 110 to 115 somewhere in there or a little smaller. They are still nice deer would be hard not to shoot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemodeerhuntersneighbor Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Bigger one is about 125 Smaller one about 115. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
layin on the smackdown Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 (edited) Velvet can be deceiving...They are both nice looking bucks, but they both look like they could use another year or two. The bigger one looks to be a 3 1/2 year old who will run around the 125 + - and the smaller one looks to be a 2 1/2 year old who will run about 110... Great pics, thanks for sharing. Edited August 15, 2009 by layin on the smackdown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.