c_lou Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Well the thumbs down is exactly what I think of my team. The only elite WR left after all the keepers were in was Reggie Wayne. I lost out on the bidding, but did milk $60 out of a fellow owner. It's glaringly obvious where my team weakness is. I don't have a true #1 WR. Peyton Manning Matt Schaub Adrian Peterson Micheal Turner Chester Taylor Donald Brown Mwelde Moore Vincent Jackson DeSean Jackson Ted Ginn Jr. Kevin Walter David Clowney Jon Carlson Anthony Fasano New England Def San Fran Def Nate Kaeding Jeff Reed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCH Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Team looks good to me. Unless your league really favors WR's, I think you're OK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_lou Posted August 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 Team looks good to me. Unless your league really favors WR's, I think you're OK. It's your basic yardage league. It's also a PPR league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NY_Bowhunter14 Posted August 31, 2009 Report Share Posted August 31, 2009 DeShawn Jackson may suprise you. I think he may have a great year with Vick and McNabb throwing to him... Looks like you will be in good shape, with Peterson AND Turner on your team... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosierhunter Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I actually like your team as well..I mean your gonna be filthy at RB and that alonge should make up 10 points per week...look at maybe giving up Turner to get a top 10 back and a top 5 WR....just a thought.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stone Cold Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 That team is good! Just a couple I would of picked different! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckbuster11 Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Forget WR's man you are loaded. Turner and Peterson on the same team? That's ridiculous. You still have some pretty good receivers anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABuckSlayer Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 I agree with Peterson and Turner you will do well. I dominated a league last year with Turner, D. Williams, and Portis. (P. Manning was my QB too). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 You're going to be fine. Both Jackson's will produce enough at WR for you considering the rest of your team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted September 1, 2009 Report Share Posted September 1, 2009 Your WRs are fine, you should go deep in the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrud Posted September 2, 2009 Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 Dude, why no A-Rod for your #1 QB?! Your team looks pretty tough. You have probably the top 2 fantasy players in AP and Turner. I really like DeSean Jackson. I picked him up early last year and he was huge in helping me win my league championship last year. I think he'll be even better this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_lou Posted September 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 2, 2009 Dude, why no A-Rod for your #1 QB?! Your team looks pretty tough. You have probably the top 2 fantasy players in AP and Turner. I really like DeSean Jackson. I picked him up early last year and he was huge in helping me win my league championship last year. I think he'll be even better this year. I traded A-Rod along with Wes Welker to get Peterson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.