Strut10 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Share Posted October 18, 2009 Got this in an e-mail. I like it: Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere. Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise." Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bums." This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tink Posted October 18, 2009 Report Share Posted October 18, 2009 Go for it Good deal!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adjam5 Posted October 18, 2009 Report Share Posted October 18, 2009 I had no idea what to expect when I read this post topic. That is a interesting take on what the 2nd Amendment and what the VT constitution means to Rep. Maslack. It is enough to make any liberal puke up their tofu burger:clown:. If this passes, VT could be on the short list for retirement destinations. Good Luck Vermont. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebeilgard Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 i finally support a gun control law. way to go, vermont. let's hope it passes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swohiodave Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 gets my vote. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PotashRLS Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 :clap::rock: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arrow32 Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 Thats great! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.