blacktailslayer Posted November 28, 2009 Report Share Posted November 28, 2009 “Finally .... A Sensible Gun Registration Plan That Will Work Vermont State Rep. Fred Maslack has read the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as Vermont 's own Constitution very carefully, and his strict interpretation of these documents is popping some eyeballs in New England and elsewhere. Maslack recently proposed a bill to register "non-gun-owners" and require them to pay a $500 fee to the state. Thus Vermont would become the first state to require a permit for the luxury of going about unarmed and assess a fee of $500 for the privilege of not owning a gun. Maslack read the "militia" phrase of the Second Amendment as not only affirming the right of the individual citizen to bear arms, but as a clear mandate to do so. He believes that universal gun ownership was advocated by the Framers of the Constitution as an antidote to a "monopoly of force" by the government as well as criminals. Vermont 's constitution states explicitly that "the people have a right to bear arms for the defense of themselves and the State" and those persons who are "conscientiously scrupulous of bearing arms" shall be required to "pay such equivalent." Clearly, says Maslack, Vermonters have a constitutional obligation to arm themselves, so that they are capable of responding to "any situation that may arise." Under the bill, adults who choose not to own a firearm would be required to register their name, address, Social Security Number, and driver's license number with the state. "There is a legitimate government interest in knowing who is not prepared to defend the state should they be asked to do so," Maslack says. Vermont already boasts a high rate of gun ownership along with the least restrictive laws of any state .. it's currently the only state that allows a citizen to carry a concealed firearm without a permit. This combination of plenty of guns and few laws regulating them has resulted in a crime rate that is the third lowest in the nation. " America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the *******s." This makes sense! There is no reason why gun owners should have to pay taxes to support police protection for people not wanting to own guns. Let them contribute their fair share and pay their own way.” bagel77 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevebeilgard Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 i love it. i hope it follows through with the entire plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoosierhunter Posted November 29, 2009 Report Share Posted November 29, 2009 very interesting. I like it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchuLace Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 We need to get this put into law around the whole country. I would love it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MNcrittergittr Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 Interesting...About time! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csimon Posted December 3, 2009 Report Share Posted December 3, 2009 very smart plan, needs to be nation wide though.:gunsmilie: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whttlbucksteve Posted December 10, 2009 Report Share Posted December 10, 2009 I like it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.