muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 (edited) Gentleman, you may already know this, but for those of you who may not, I'm more than just an insightful sports mind. In my spare time, I'm also a bit of a mathematician. So, after several years of study and research based mainly on the inverse correlation between females from Cleveland and Pittsburgh, I am please to finally announce my greatest acheivement to date; The Muggsbowean Theorem. You see, if I do not go into this sort of detail, there are certain members of this forum (if not of society in general) that may scoff at such an idea, merely as "smack talk." But gentlemen, I assure you, this formual has been scientifically developed and tested. Its beauty lies in its simplicity...so, I give you the Muggsbowean Theorem. Developed using the Muggsbowean Attraction Scale of 1-10, 10 being the hottest chick around, allow C=a female from Cleveland and P=a female from Pittsburgh. The theorem is P/2=C. In laymens terms and using this in a real life scenario, if a chick is considered to be an "8" in Pittsburgh, by comparison, when she crosses into the Cleveland City limits, she automatically becomes a "4." "Smack talk?" Me thinks not... Good day sirs. Edited December 18, 2009 by muggs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texastrophies Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 the hottest check around, Good day sirs. It must suck to have to pay for it.:crutch::crutch::crutch: With a check that bounces, no less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCH Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 It must suck to have to pay for it.:crutch::crutch::crutch: With a check that bounces, no less. In his spare time, maybe instead of being a "mathematian", he should study some spelling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 (edited) In his spare time, maybe instead of being a "mathematian", he should study some spelling. type-o bud. You gotta understand, nobody's perfect, I come about as close as you can, but it's hard to for my fingers to keep up with my sharp wit...and I type about 197 WPM. btw- your check just got lost in the mail.:pacman::yes: Edited December 18, 2009 by muggs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texastrophies Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 type-o bud. You gotta understand, nobody's perfect, I come about as close as you can, but it's hard to for my fingers to keep up with my sharp wit...and I type about 197 WPM. No, you went back in and fixed the typo from femal to female. I am pretty sure you typed what you meant in this case.:pacman::pacman::pacman: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 No, you went back in and fixed the typo from femal to female. I am pretty sure you typed what you meant in this case.:pacman::pacman::pacman: It usually takes me about 4 edits to check all my type-o's. Anyway, nice work, you're like Gary Sinese from NCIS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texastrophies Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 It usually takes me about 4 edits to check all my type-o's. Anyway, nice work, you're like Gary Sinese from NCIS. Just as long as you don't compare me to Tominator, it will be all good. :cool2: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 Just as long as you don't compare me to Tominator, it will be all good. :cool2: Dude, I'd never do that, I realize you're a much better hunter man. Cue Chris in 3...2...1... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubledrop Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 Muggs I dont know what it is these days but I agree with you on alot of things here lately. The pittsburgh chicks just arent cutting it here in Ohio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCH Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 btw- your check just got lost in the mail.:pacman::yes: You sent me a chick???? Pittsburg or Cleveland????:D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 I agree with you on alot of things here lately. Congratulations, this is the first realization along the path to enlightenment. Kev, Cleveland man, I hook my buds up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_lou Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 I think we need a corollary addendum to this theorem. Something along the lines of: I firmly believe the further South you get, the hotter the chicks. So lets divide the country in to 4 hypothetical zones labeled Z1 - Z4. C is in zone 1 along with rest of the northern parts. So the equation would be C=Z1. The equations go like this. C/2=Z2 Z2/2=Z3 Z3/2=Z4 So basically some of the best looking chicks in the country would be in the Miami/San Diego zone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubledrop Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 You sent me a chick???? Pittsburg or Cleveland????:D for you????????????hmmmmm.....Pittsburgh or pixburg if your from that area. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 I think we need a corollary addendum to this theorem. Something along the lines of: I firmly believe the further South you get, the hotter the chicks. So lets divide the country in to 4 hypothetical zones labeled Z1 - Z4. C is in zone 1 along with rest of the northern parts. So the equation would be C=Z1. The equations go like this. C/2=Z2 Z2/2=Z3 Z3/2=Z4 So basically some of the best looking chicks in the country would be in the Miami/San Diego zone. I concur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCH Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 I concur. And what zone does Sarah fall in??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 And what zone does Sarah fall in??? She looks like one of those girls from Ohio who moves to Sad Diego.:pacman: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 18, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 And what zone does Sarah fall in??? She's the rare anamoly, a Z2 that looks like a Z4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PAhunter14 Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 Which part of this equation proves your sports knowlege?? BTW, forget about Pittsburgh... watch Penn st womens volleyball play for the national championship tomorrow and check out some State College girls!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tominator Posted December 21, 2009 Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Gentleman, you may already know this, but for those of you who may not, I'm more than just an insightful sports mind. In my spare time, I'm also a bit of a mathematician. So, after several years of study and research based mainly on the inverse correlation between females from Cleveland and Pittsburgh, I am please to finally announce my greatest acheivement to date; The Muggsbowean Theorem. You see, if I do not go into this sort of detail, there are certain members of this forum (if not of society in general) that may scoff at such an idea, merely as "smack talk." But gentlemen, I assure you, this formual has been scientifically developed and tested. Its beauty lies in its simplicity...so, I give you the Muggsbowean Theorem. Developed using the Muggsbowean Attraction Scale of 1-10, 10 being the hottest chick around, allow C=a female from Cleveland and P=a female from Pittsburgh. The theorem is P/2=C. In laymens terms and using this in a real life scenario, if a chick is considered to be an "8" in Pittsburgh, by comparison, when she crosses into the Cleveland City limits, she automatically becomes a "4." "Smack talk?" Me thinks not... Good day sirs. You missed a few muggs and Chuck. You gotta understand, nobody's perfect, I come about as close as you can, but it's hard to for my fingers to keep up with my Say the bolded part out loud to yourself. Dude, I'd never do that, I realize you're a much better hunter man. Cue Chris in 3...2...1... No typos in that one, however, the statement is completely false. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 21, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 21, 2009 Say the bolded part out loud to yourself. You see what I mean, Chris? This mind is just too quick for anyone's fingers to match it. I need to hire one of those court stenographers with the shorthand machines I think. I'd probably have that thing smoking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tominator Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 You see what I mean, Chris? This mind is just too quick for anyone's fingers to match it. I need to hire one of those court stenographers with the shorthand machines I think. I'd probably have that thing smoking. The stenographer, or the machine? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muggs Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 The stenographer, or the machine? Haha. Depending how things go, hopefully both.:clap: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.