New York Animal Cruelty Bill Will Make Criminals!!


LifeNRA

Recommended Posts

New York Animal Cruelty Bill Will Make Criminals of Sportsmen- (02/17)

New York sportsmen should urge state lawmakers to defeat an assembly bill that will make hunting a punishable act of animal cruelty.

Assembly Bill 1850, introduced by Assemblyman Alexander Grannis, D-New York, would revise the state’s definition of animal cruelty to include “killing or injuring...wild game and wild birds.” The revision would make legal hunting and trapping activities criminal offenses. The bill is being considered before the Assembly Agriculture Committee.

“The bill creates a contradiction in the law as the state code allows regulated hunting,” said Tony Celebrezze, U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance director of state services. “But the definition of animal cruelty in the bill makes hunting illegal.

“If AB 1850 becomes law, anti-hunters will have a field day ensuring that sportsmen are prosecuted on animal cruelty charges,” said Celebrezze.

Anti-hunting lawmakers nationwide are introducing vague or poorly worded animal cruelty legislation in an effort to outlaw hunting.

Assembly Bill 1850 bares striking similarities to a Texas bill that would turn common hunting practices into criminal acts of animal cruelty. Sportsmen in Iowa and Connecticut have also had to defeat animal cruelty bills that threatened hunting with hounds.

Take Action! New York sportsmen should ask your assemblymen to oppose AB 1850! Explain that this bill will make criminals out of law abiding sportsmen. To contact your assemblyman, call (518) 455-2800. Sportsmen can also find their legislators using the Legislative Action Center at www.ussportsmen.org.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: New York Animal Cruelty Bill Will Make Criminals!!

What, the NRA-ILA didn't post the whole bill !!

A01850 Summary:

SAME AS Same as S 2138

SPONSOR Grannis

COSPNSR

MLTSPNSR Paulin

Amd S353-a, Ag & Mkts L

Prohibits aggravated cruelty to wild game and wild birds.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A01850 Actions:

01/21/2005 referred to agriculture

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A01850 Votes:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A01850 Memo:

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in

relation to prohibiting aggravated cruelty to wildlife

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This legislation would expand the

existing aggravated cruelty law to cover intentional acts of extreme

cruelty to wildlife as well as companion animals.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Subdivision 1 of section 353-a of the

agriculture and markets law, is amended to expand the existing

aggravated cruelty law to cover intentional acts of extreme cruelty to

wildlife as defined in section 11-0103 of the environmental

conservation law.

JUSTIFICATION: This legislation will extend the coverage of the felony

animal cruelty law to cover wildlife. Since the passage of the felony

animal cruelty there have been a number of egregious cases in which

wild animals have been captured and tortured. This bill would allow

these cases to be prosecuted under the felony animal cruelty statute.

It is important to note that in no way would this change affect the

lawful hunting or trapping licensed by the Department of Environmental

Conservation.

The stringent standard of proof created by the "aggravating" factors

contained in the felony law -- that require proof of intent to cause

extreme physical pain or that the conduct was especially depraved or

sadistic -- would remain unchanged, thereby ensuring that only the

most heinous cases of the mistreatment of wild animals are treated as

felony offenses.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2004: A.6507 - Agriculture 2003: A.6507 -

Agriculture

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after

it shall have become law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: New York Animal Cruelty Bill Will Make Criminals!!

Not trying to bash, I just know that from previous cut and pastes from NRA-ILA that they have a habit of not posting the whole story or making things seem worse than they are. With the advent of technoology and the internet I am amazed that any organization, political or otherwise, would post erroneous information when it is possible to dispute allegations within a matter of minutes. Of course, most people aren't going to bother with fact checking, so more often than not they get away with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: New York Animal Cruelty Bill Will Make Criminals!!

[ QUOTE ]

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Subdivision 1 of section 353-a of the

agriculture and markets law, is amended to expand the existing

aggravated cruelty law to cover intentional acts of extreme cruelty to

wildlife as defined in section 11-0103 of the environmental

conservation law.

It is important to note that in no way would this change affect the

lawful hunting or trapping licensed by the Department of Environmental

Conservation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for that slugger.

The amendment still has reason for concern for hunters, especially in the case of wounding an animal. This amendment will give the anti-hunters an edge in the courts. After-all, when a hunter decides to pull the trigger, that is intentional, is it not. And if he severely wounds an animal, but does not fatally wound it, could that not be interpreted in the courts as "an intentional act of extreme cruelty".

Don't get me wrong. I'm all for prosecuting these people who mistreat and intentionally harm wildlife, pets and livestock, but do we really need the amendment to better enforce the laws already on the books.?? As an avid outdoorsman and hunter, you can't help but wonder, where these amendments will eventually take us, in the grand scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: New York Animal Cruelty Bill Will Make Criminals!!

[ QUOTE ]

Not trying to bash, I just know that from previous cut and pastes from NRA-ILA that they have a habit of not posting the whole story or making things seem worse than they are. With the advent of technoology and the internet I am amazed that any organization, political or otherwise, would post erroneous information when it is possible to dispute allegations within a matter of minutes. Of course, most people aren't going to bother with fact checking, so more often than not they get away with it.

[/ QUOTE ]

It didn't stop CBS from airling it to a live audience what they had "cut and pasted" - why would think anyone else would be different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.