RangerClay Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Where's Swampy? I'll second that! :ban: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swamphunter Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 Where's Swampy? I've been avoiding this thread.. but was paged by a buddy to come check it out... I'm watching now.... !! WooHoo!! :boxing: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swamphunter Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I've realized that this is too much to read.... I'm gonna take a nap:yawn::sleep1: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tominator Posted April 19, 2010 Report Share Posted April 19, 2010 I've realized that this is too much to read.... I'm gonna take a nap:yawn::sleep1: LMAO You act like you're retired or something. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jci63 Posted April 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 New Watchdog Probe Into Ohio Wildlife Licenses Associated Press COLUMBUS, Ohio—The state watchdog is investigating allegations that wildlife officers broke the law by providing out-of-state wildlife officers Ohio fishing licenses at a discount, The Associated Press has learned. The probe by the Ohio Inspector General follows similar allegations involving a hunting license that has led to felony charges against the wildlife division’s top administrators. All are on paid leave while they are prosecuted over the hunting license allegations. The Ohio Division of Wildlife reprimanded two officers in 2007 for helping fellow wildlife officers from Indiana obtain Ohio fishing licenses at the lower, Ohio rate of $19, according to wildlife records released to the AP through a records request. The officers let the Indiana officers use the Ohio address of wildlife regional offices in Xenia in southwest Ohio. Normally, the Indiana officers would have paid $40 for the license. Indiana allows out-of-state wildlife officers who are in the state on official business to obtain hunting and fishing licenses at in-state rates. Ohio does not have a similar policy, and it is illegal to put down false information on the licenses when filling them out. The Oct. 7, 2008, letter of reprimand indicates the officers had a supervisor’s authority to obtain the licenses. Despite that, “This was against Division of Wildlife directive and should not be repeated again in the future,“ according to the letters signed by Todd Haines, then the manager of the Xenia office. Haines is one of six officials who have pleaded not guilty in the 2006 case of an Ohio wildlife officer who let a South Carolina officer use his home address to receive a $19 Ohio hunting license, saving $106. Haines was charged with one count of obstructing justice and one count of complicity. Josh Zientek, one of the wildlife officers reprimanded over the fishing license issue, declined to comment Tuesday. “I trust the system and we’ve just got to let the system work,“ he said. At issue with the hunting license is whether Ohio officials knowingly broke the law. Several told investigators that the practice was widespread in the past. David Graham, chief of the Ohio Wildlife Division, told investigators the practice of providing the in-state license rate was probably outdated but he didn’t think of it as a crime. “I just had come to the conclusion over time that it just wasn’t the probably a socially acceptable thing to do anymore,“ Graham said in a Feb. 1, 2010, interview with investigators reviewed by the AP. However, the inspector general’s investigation of the hunting license issue released last week says officials knew what happened was illegal. “The reality is that Wildlife administrators knew that providing false information on the hunting license application is a criminal offense,“ the report said. Graham also acknowledged to investigators he was close friends with Allan Wright, the wildlife officer who allegedly obtained the cheaper hunting license for the South Carolina official. Graham has pleaded not guilty to one count of obstructing justice and one count of complicity http://www2.nbc4i.com/cmh/news/crime/article/new_watchdog_probe_into_ohio_wildlife_licenses/35402/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangerClay Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Enough already! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jci63 Posted April 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Eric Vaughn “is a material witness” in the case and no “comment on his testimony.” However, Ohio will “not be pursuing any charges against Eric Vaughn in connection with the resident hunting license.” Defendant: Wright, Allan * VIOLATION OF: 2913.42A1 TAMPERING W/RECORDS F3 * VIOLATION OF: 2913.42A2 TAMPERING W/RECORDS F3 * VIOLATION OF: 2921.13A5, FALSIFICATION M1 HEARING SET FOR 04/21/2010 AT 02:00 PM TYPE PRT JR# 419 PG# 456 -ENTRY, IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL PROSECUTING ATTORNEY IN AND FOR BROWN COUNTY OHIO, THAT DAVID KELLEY BE APPOINTED ATTORNEY FOR ALLAN WRIGHT Defendant: Graham, David * VIOLATION OF: 2921.32A6 OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE F5 * VIOLATION OF: 2923.03A2 COMPLICITY(OBS.JUST) F5 HEARING SET FOR 04/27/2010 AT 08:30 AM TYPE PRT Defendant: Lehman, James * VIOLATION OF: 2923.03A2 COMPLICITY (OBS.JUST F5 * VIOLATION OF: 2921.32A6 OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE F5 HEARING SET FOR 04/28/2010 AT 09:00 AM TYPE PRT Atty 1: Michael E. Cassity Defendant: Tackett,Ward, Michele * VIOLATION OF: 2921.32A6 OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE F5 * VIOLATION OF: 2923.03A2 COMPLICITY(OBS.JUST) F5 VACATED HEARING SET FOR 04/21/2010 AT 11:00 AM TYPE APP Defendant: Haines, Todd * VIOLATION OF: 2921.32A6 OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE F5 * VIOLATION OF: 2923.03A2 COMPLICITY(OBS.JUST) F5 HEARING SET FOR 04/21/2010 AT 11:00 AM TYPE APP Atty 1: John Woliver Defendant: Miller, Randy * VIOLATION OF: 2921.32A6 OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE F5 * VIOLATION OF: 2923.03A2 COMPLICITY(OBS.JUST) F5 HEARING SET FOR 04/21/2010 AT 11:00 AM TYPE PRT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jci63 Posted April 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Maybe I originally posted this in the wrong section. If it belongs in a different section, please move it. Sorry to all those whom don't want to read the information.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tominator Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Maybe I originally posted this in the wrong section. If it belongs in a different section, please move it. Sorry to all those whom don't want to read the information.... It's in the right section I guess, but my question is, why do you feel so compelled to keep posting updates? If we want to read about this, we know where to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woolybear Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nut Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 It's in the right section I guess, but my question is, why do you feel so compelled to keep posting updates? If we want to read about this, we know where to go. That is what I have been wondering also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wtnhunt Posted April 21, 2010 Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 Originally Posted by Tominator It's in the right section I guess, but my question is, why do you feel so compelled to keep posting updates? If we want to read about this, we know where to go. That is what I have been wondering also. Finally got a chance to glance this over, and kinda wondering the same thing, seems as though you have a personal interest in this case. This is the right room though, pertains to deer hunting. Can understand the initial posting and reason for it, but not sure I understand the reason for continuing to post the day to day updates with the excess details. Guess if folks don't want to read they don't have to, but might be best to hold off on posting anymore updates until things with the case are finished. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jci63 Posted April 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted April 21, 2010 but might be best to hold off on posting anymore updates until things with the case are finished. Will do! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swamphunter Posted April 23, 2010 Report Share Posted April 23, 2010 seems as though you have a personal interest in this case. Bingo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.